| |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 SC MSJ A B C D
|
IndicesInstructional Faculty(Permanent/ Probationary/Temporary) |
IndicesCounselor(Permanent/ Probationary/Temporary) |
IndicesLibrarian(Permanent/ Probationary/Temporary) |
|
7.1.1 For a given course the desired effects shall include those stated objectives in the adopted course description and any additional written objectives developed by the discipline. Where it is difficult to assess the effects of services performed, other indices, such as knowledge of the subject matter, observed competence in teaching, and fulfillment of job responsibilities may be included. Examples of indices appropriate to instructional faculty members include, but are not limited to:
7.1.1.1 Demonstrated knowledge of the subject matter being taught and of the discipline in general;
7.1.1.2 Consistent and careful planning in accordance with the official course description;
7.1.1.3 Development and use of instructional techniques which recognize individual differences in students.
7.1.1.4 Lecture or lab activities and tests reflect the official course descriptions.* |
7.1.2 Examples of indices for counselors include, but are not limited to:
7.1.2.1 Demonstrated knowledge and its application to the community college of counseling techniques, guidance tools, guidance information and resources, and current developments in counseling and guidance;
7.1.2.2 Maintaining the integrity of the counseling relationship;
7.1.2.3 Maintaining the ethical standards of the counseling profession;
7.1.2.4 Performing counseling and guidance activities;
7.1.2.5 Interaction with students is in accordance with the standards of the American Association of University Professors. *
|
7.1.3 Examples of indices for librarians include, but are not limited to:
7.1.3.1 Demonstrated knowledge of librarianship and its application to the community college;
7.1.3.2 Current and careful planning in organizing the library for the use of students and faculty;
7.1.3.3 Assisting student in learning activities;
7.1.3.4 Observing the ethical principles of the teaching and librarianship professions;
7.1.3.5 Performing other librarianship responsibilities;
7.1.3.6 Interaction with students is in accordance with the standards of the American Association of University Professors.*
|
7-1
7.1 Criteria for Evaluation [* denotes indices to be added to evaluation form]
IndicesInstructional Faculty(Permanent/ Probationary/Temporary) |
IndicesCounselor(Permanent/ Probationary/Temporary) |
IndicesLibrarian(Permanent/ Probationary/Temporary) |
|
7.1.1.5 In class use of instructional support materials such as textbook(s), syllabi, media, handouts, etc. *
7.1.1.6 Interaction with students is in accordance with the standards of the American Association of University Professors. *
7.1.1.7 Instruction/student assignments reflect current standards in the discipline.*
7.1.1.8 Maintains currency in the field of study/ instruction.
7.1.1.9 Behavior towards students as identified in the student evaluation form of the CBA (see items #3, 5, 15, 17, 33, 34)
Each discipline will have the opportunity to recommend criteria which recognize special characteristics of the discipline.
|
7.1.2.6 Counseling reflects current standards in the discipline.*
7.1.2.7 Instruction/student assignments reflect current standards in the discipline.*
7.1.2.8 Maintains currency in the field
7.1.2.9 Behavior towards students as identified in the student evaluation form of the CBA (see items #8, 9.)
The counseling faculty shall have the opportunity to recommend criteria which recognize special characteristics of the discipline.
|
7.1.3.7 Librarianship reflects current standards in the discipline;*
7.1.3.8 Currency in the field of study/discipline.*
7.1.3.9 Behavior towards students as identified in the student evaluation form of the CBA (see items #4, 8).
The library faculty will have an opportunity to recommend criteria which recognize special characteristics of library service
|
7-2
7.1.4 Off-site Clinical/Laboratory Facility Evaluation (Permanent/Probationary/Temporary)
For faculty assigned to off-site clinical/laboratory facilities, (e.g. hospitals, childcare centers, dental offices, etc.,) off campus instruction will be part of the evaluation process. Evaluation form will be developed by the District and UPM/AFT.
7.2 Evaluation Procedures: Probationary Unit Member
7.2.1 Purpose. To provide suggestions for improvement, if any, and to determine re-employment of probationary unit members.
7.2.2 Frequency. During each year of service by a probationary unit member there shall usually be one (1) formal written evaluation. The evaluator or evaluee may request a second evaluation be made in the same academic year/workyear.
7.2.3 Content. A probationary unit member is entitled to a clear, fair, and equitable evaluation procedure. The content of the evaluator's written evaluation must be a summary of the information provided through the contractually agreed upon evaluation processes and instruments.
7.2.4 Evaluation Team Members.
a) Evaluator: Manager, named by the supervising Vice President.
b) UPM Advisor: Named by UPM/AFT to advise evaluee.
c) Evaluee: Unit member being evaluated.
7.2.5 Processes/Responsibilities of Each Team Member/Time Lines. [See Chart A]
7.3 Evaluation Procedures: Permanent Unit Member
7.3.1 Purpose. To provide suggestions for improvement, if any.
7.3.2 Frequency. Once every three (3) years (excluding leave periods) alternately through either self-evaluation (using the Professional Self-Evaluation Form) (Form F 7.0 (h)) or through the Performance Observation process (Forms F 7.0 (a), (b), (c), (d)).
7.3.2.1 Exemption. A permanent unit member on leave from the District shall be exempt from evaluation for the period of the leave.
7-3
7.3.3 Evaluation Cycle. Half of the faculty, in alphabetical order, shall begin with self-evaluation; the other half with performance observation. Said cycle began with the Fall semesters of 1991 and 1992.
7.3.4 Content. A permanent unit member is entitled to a clear, fair and equitable evaluation procedure. The content of the evaluator's written evaluation, when applicable, must be a summary of the information provided through the contractually agreed upon evaluation processes and instruments.
7.3.5 Evaluation Team Members.
a) Peer Evaluator: A qualified, permanent unit member.
b) UPM Advisor: Named by UPM/AFT to advise evaluee.
c) Evaluee: Unit member being evaluated.
d) Manager: Facilitates process and receives evaluation materials.
7.3.6. Processes/Responsibilities of Each Team Member/Time Lines. [See Chart B 1 & 2]
7.3.7 Recommendations for Individual Improvement.
(a) Evaluees who receive an evaluation that includes specific recommendations for professional improvement may with consultation from their UPM advisor, complete an agreement with the District in which they shall describe a recommended plan of action for accomplishing the required professional improvement in their performance.
(b) Should the evaluee volunteer to participate in the recommended professional improvement program, all economic costs of an agreed upon program (examples: reassigned time or overload compensation for additional hours beyond those contractually assigned in Art. VIII of the CBA, books, tuition, etc.) shall be paid by the District.
(c) Permanent unit members shall have 45 working days to reach an agreement with the District regarding the elements of their professional improvement program and indicate his/her decision to participate in the program. Permanent unit members may be represented by UPM in the negotiations required here.
7-4
7.3.8 Causes for Further Action. Except for the discovery of:
(a) immoral or unprofessional conduct;
(b) dishonesty;
(c) unsatisfactory performance;
(d) evident unfitness for service;
(e) physical or mental condition that makes the unit member unfit to instruct or associate with students;
(f) persistent violation of, or refusal to obey, the school laws of the state or reasonable regulations prescribed for the government of the
community colleges by the board of governors or by the governing board of the College;
(g) conviction of a felony or of any crime involving moral turpitude;
(h) or discovery of violations of UPM-MCCD contract provisions.
permanent unit members shall not be subject to punishment, discipline or removal from their positions for observations and or judgments made during their respective evaluations. Initial discovery of any of the aforementioned causes during the evaluation process shall be grounds for further investigation.
7.4 Evaluation Procedures: Temporary Non-Credit Unit Member. [See Chart C]
7.5 Evaluation Procedures: Community Service (fee based) Unit Member. [See Chart D]
7.6 Evaluation Procedures: Temporary Credit Unit Member. [See Chart E]
7.7 Faculty Assignments As Peer Evaluators
Unit members shall be required to serve as peer evaluators on no more than two (2) evaluation processes per academic year/workyear.
7.7.1 Failure of Peer Evaluator to Meet Evaluation Responsibilities. In the event the peer evaluator fails to initiate the evaluation procedure and/or meet the designated time lines of the evaluation by February 1, the District shall designate a management representative who shall perform the evaluation and the provisions of Article 24.9 shall apply. 7-5
7.8 Personnel Files
There shall be only one (1) personnel file for each unit member. This file shall be maintained at one (1) location in Human Resources. It shall be available for inspection by the unit member or a representative expressly authorized by the unit member upon request. Access to files shall be limited to authorized personnel and those included in Government Code Section 6250. Documents in the personnel file of a unit member which may serve as a basis for affecting the status of his/her employment shall be made available for inspection by the unit member or by a representative authorized in writing by the unit member. The unit member does not have the right to review ratings, reports, or records which were obtained prior to the employment of the unit member or as otherwise excluded by law.
7.8.1 All documents relative to a unit member's employment relationship shall be contained in the unit member's personnel file in Human Resources.
7.8.2 Contents of the personnel file shall be kept in the strictest confidence in keeping with appropriate provisions of the California Education and
Government Codes.
7.8.3 Every unit member shall have the right to inspect and inventory his/her personnel file upon request, provided that the request and inspection/inventory
are made at a time other than the unit member's assigned hours, but during normal District business hours.
7.8.4 Information of a derogatory nature shall not be entered or filed unless and until the unit member is given notice of such information and an opportunity
to review the document(s).
7.8.5 Anonymous communications or material unrelated to the unit member's professional responsibilities shall not be placed in the unit member's personnel
file.
7.8.6 A unit member shall have the right to have attached to any derogatory statement, the unit member's written comments. Review shall take place during
normal business hours, and a non-instructional unit member shall be released from assigned hours for this purpose without salary reduction.
7.8.7 The District shall not take any adverse action against a unit member based upon documents which are contained in such unit member's personnel file
unless the materials were placed in the file within forty-five (45) working days of the date when the District knew or should have known of the event
giving rise to the documents.
7.8.8 Human Resources shall, upon written authorization of the unit member, release information and/or forward specified documents from his/her personnel file to parties the unit member designates.
7-19
7.9 Children’s Center Faculty Evaluation Criteria
The College of Marin Children’s Centers are operated under both Title 22, State Licensing Standards for Health and Safety, and Title V, the program standards of the Child Development Division of the State Department of Education. All certified teachers working in the center are required to meet these standards and shall be evaluated accordingly. Unit members being evaluated shall have an opportunity to recommend additional criteria which recognizes the special characteristics of the MCCD Children’s Center.
7.9.1 Purpose: The purpose of teacher evaluation is to provide feedback to each teacher for the improvement of his/her professional services in working with children, families and community. These evaluations shall be non-punitive.
7.9.2 Frequency: During each year (as required by the State of California), all permanent/probationary and temporary/part-time unit members shall participate in the evaluation process.
7.9.3 Content: The unit member is entitled to a clear, fair and equitable evaluation. The content of the evaluator’s written evaluation must be a summary of the information provided through contractually agreed upon evaluation procedures and instruments.
(a) Evaluators: Peer – Site Supervisor, Assistant Site Supervisor or Teacher
Management – Director of Child Care Programs
(b) UPM Advisor: Named by UPM/AFT to advise evaluee
(c) Evaluee: Unit member being evaluated
7-20
7.9.5 Evaluation Process: Probationary and Temporary/Part-Time CC Unit Members
|
Process |
Team Member |
Responsibility |
Time Line |
|
Professional Self Evaluation/Action Plan |
Evaluee
|
§ Prepares after consultation with peer evaluator § Submits to Director |
By Sept. 15 of each year |
|
Evaluation Report |
Peer Evaluator Director
Director Evaluee UPM Advisor
Director
|
§ With input from peer evaluator, the Director completes the Evaluation Report that includes a final written evaluation summarizing information Provided through the contractually agreed upon evaluation criteria, Procedures and instruments that assesses:
§ Success in meeting the evaluation criteria; § Achievement of outcomes of the self evaluation/action plan; § Suitability for working with children; § Mutual expectations for the future; § Recommendations for improvements, if any.
§ Director meets with evaluee to review the Evaluation Report § Evaluee reviews Evaluation Report with UPM Advisor § Any recommendations for improvement are shown to evaluee § Evaluee reviews with UPM Advisor § Evaluee may attach comments to the report and the UPM Advisor may attach a separate statement before it is submitted to the appropriate District office § Evaluee and UPM Advisor sign off on documents
§ Director makes recommendation concerning re-employment |
1st Year – By Dec. 15
Subsequent Years – By February 15th |
7-21
7.9.6 Evaluation Process: Permanent CC Unit Members
(a) Evaluators: Peer – Site Supervisor, Assistant Site Supervisor, Lead Teacher or any permanent unit member currently working in the Children’s
Center
(b) UPM Advisor: Named by UPM/AFT to advise evaluee
(c) Evaluee: Unit member being evaluated
|
Process |
Team Member |
Responsibility |
Time Line |
|
Professional Self Evaluation/Action Plan |
Evaluee |
§ Prepares after consultation with peer evaluator
§ Submits to Director |
During Fall Staff Development Flex period
Start of Fall semester each year
|
|
Evaluation Report |
Peer Evaluator Evaluee
Peer Evaluator
Director Peer Evaluator UPM Advisor Evaluee
|
§ Peer evaluator and evaluee meet to conduct peer review to assess: § Success in meeting the evaluation criteria; § Achievement of outcomes of the self evaluation/action plan; § Suitability for working with children; § Mutual expectations for the future;
§ Peer evaluator completes the Evaluation Report that includes a final Written evaluation summarizing information provided through the Contractually agreed upon evaluation criteria, procedures and Instruments and submits to the Director.
§ Director consults with the peer evaluator and UPM Advisor on the status of the evaluee. § Following a review and signoff by the UPM Advisor, the Director may, if necessary, develop specific recommendations for improvement. These are shown first to evaluee who reviews with His/Her UPM Advisor. § Evaluee may attach comments to the report and the UPM Advisor may Attach a separate statement. |
By Feb. 1 each year
By Feb. 15 each year |
7-22
7.9.7 Recommendations for Individual Improvement. If specific recommendations for improvement are developed, Article 7.3.6 of the CBA applies.
7.9.8 Causes for Further Action. Article 7.3.8 of the CBA applies.
7.10 Children’s Center Unit Members – Other Personnel File
In addition to the personnel file kept in Human Resources (referenced in Article 7.8) a Children’s Center teacher is required by Title 22 to have a copy of the following on file in the classroom where he/she is assigned.
(a) Fingerprint and criminal record clearance;
(b) Signed statement of child abuse reporting requirements;
(c) Signed statement of personnel rights;
(d) Copy of TB test clearance – yearly; Doctor’s clearance to work with children.
Except as specified herein, all other provisions of Article 7 do not apply to unit members assigned to the Children’s Center.
7-23
7.2.5 Evaluation Process: Probationary Unit Member - Chart A
The unit member shall be evaluated using the forms, processes and criteria contractually agreed upon, as outlined below:
Note: During each year of service by a probationary unit member there shall be usually one (1) formal written evaluation. The evaluator or evaluee may request a second evaluation be made in the same academic/work year.
|
Process |
Team Member |
Responsibility |
Time Line |
|
A. Performance Observation
Forms: F7.0 (a), (b), (c), (d) – as applicable |
Manager
Manager UPM Advisor Peer Evaluator (if applicable)
Manager UPM Advisor Peer Evaluator (if applicable)
UPM Advisor
Evaluee
|
§ Schedules classroom or other on-the-job visits (e.g. counselors, librarians, School nurse and/or other unit member) at a time acceptable to evaluee
§ Makes classroom or other on-the-job visits jointly
§ Completes applicable form(s)
§ Appointed by UPM/AFT
§ Advises evaluee in all phases of the evaluation
§ Chooses a peer evaluator (permanent unit member) to serve on the team, if Desired
§ Makes the following available to the team: Syllabi Sample of evaluation tool for measuring student progress |
ASAP Fall Semester each probationary year
ASAP Fall Semester each probationary year
During Visits
ASAP Fall Semester each probationary year
On-going
ASAP Fall Semester each probationary year
Prior to Observation
|
7-6
7.2.5 Evaluation Process: Probationary Unit Member – Chart A
The unit member shall be evaluated using the forms, processes and criteria contractually agreed upon, as outlined below:
|
Process |
Team Member |
Responsibility |
Time Line |
B. Student Evaluation
Purpose: To provide each unit member and the evaluator with feedback about student perceptions of his/her teaching.
Form: Student Evaluation Form (SEF 7.0 (e), (f), (g) – as applicable
|
Manager/ Designee OR UPM Advisor |
§ Administers Student Evaluation Form (SEF) - Administered to maximum of two (2) classes containing a different Population of enrolled students. The same student population may be used if the courses are not identical.
§ If administering: - Shall be trained by means of the self-instruction package; - Shall be present during the administration of SEF; - Shall collect all forms at the end of the session.
|
ASAP Fall Semester each probationary year |
|
C. Professional Self Evaluation
Form F7.0 (h) |
Evaluee
Manager UPM Advisor |
§ Shall furnish the Manager and UPM Advisor with a self-evaluation as Provided for on the Professional Self Evaluation Form
§ Reviews Professional Self Evaluation |
First day of Spring non-mandatory flex during each probationary year
Between first day of Spring non-mandatory flex and February 1 each probationary year |
|
D. Statement of Professional Objectives
Form F7.0 (i) |
Evaluee |
§ Consults with Manager, UPM Advisor and prepares for the Manager and UPM Advisor a written statement of his/her professional objectives (as provided for On the “Statement of Professional Objectives.” The objectives shall include: - The positive effects intended for students by the teaching, counseling, library or other services; - The ways in which the evaluee plans to achieve these effects; - Specification by the evaluee of the manner of evaluating the success of these effects. § Responsibility to carry out the plan and submit an initial assessment of its Outcomes utilizing the Professional Self Evaluation Criteria |
Completed prior to September 15 each probationary year
First day of Spring non-mandatory flex during each probationary year |
7-7
7.2.5 Evaluation Process: Probationary Unit Member – Chart A
The unit member shall be evaluated using the forms, processes and criteria contractually agreed upon, as outlined below:
Process |
Team Member |
Responsibility |
Time Line |
|
D. Statement of Professional Objectives (Continued)
Form F7.0 (i) |
Manager UPM Advisor |
§ Reviews Statement of Professional Objectives
§ Reviews Initial Assessment of Outcomes |
After September 15 each probationary year
Between first day of Spring non-mandatory flex and February 1 each probationary year
|
E. Final Written Summary
(Includes information from: Performance Observation, Student Evaluations, Statement of Professional Objectives, and Professional Self Evaluation)
Form F7.0 (k) |
Manager
Evaluee UPM Advisor |
§ Writes a Final Summary Evaluation of the information provided through the Contractually agreed upon evaluation criteria, processes and instruments (Performance Observation, Student Evaluations, Professional Self Evaluation and Statement of Professional Objectives)
Final Written Summary Evaluation includes: - Results from the evaluation processes; - Manager evaluation of indices outside the classroom or job site; - Suggestion for improvement, if any; - Recommendation concerning re-employment
§ Recommendations for Improvement, if made, shall: - Include in-service training to improve job performance; - Explicitly define the District’s expectations and time lines for improvement
§ Meets with the evaluee to show him/her the evaluation
§ Submits all evaluation materials to Human Resources
§ Review Final Written Summary Evaluation together § Evaluee may attach comments to Manager’s Report; UPM Advisor may attach Separate Statement to Manager’s Report
|
No later than February 20 each probationary year
No later than February 20 each probationary year
No later than February 20 each probationary year
By February 20 each probationary year
Prior to February 20 each probationary year |
7-8
7.3.5 Evaluation Process: Permanent Unit Member – Unit Members Evaluated through Performance Observation - Chart B 1
The unit member shall be evaluated using the forms, processes and criteria contractually agreed upon, as outlined below:
Process |
Team Member |
Responsibility |
Time Line |
|
A. Performance Observation
Alternating periods of three (3) years
Form F7.0 (a), (b), (c), (d) – as applicable |
Evaluee
Peer Evaluator
UPM Advisor |
§ Chooses Peer Evaluator and notifies supervising Vice President/Dean
If Peer Evaluator not chosen within 30 days, supervising Vice President/Dean Appoints Peer Evaluator
§ Makes the following available to the Peer Evaluator: - Syllabi - Sample of evaluation tool for measuring student progress
§ Makes classroom or other on-the-job visits (e.g. counselors, librarians, school Nurse and/or other unit member) at a time acceptable to the evaluee
§ Completes applicable form(s)
§ Submits Evaluation Progress Report (Form F7.0 (j)) to supervising Vice President/Dean
§ Appointed by UPM/AFT
§ Advises evaluee in all phases of the evaluation process
|
Within 30 days of notice from the District
Prior to Observation
Beginning of Fall Semester, but no later than November 1
During visits
By December 1
On-going
|
7-9
The unit member shall be evaluated using the forms, processes and criteria contractually agreed upon, as outlined below:
Process |
Team Member |
Responsibility |
Time Line |
C. Student Evaluation
Forms F7.0 (e), (f), (g), as applicable
|
Peer Evaluator OR UPM Advisor |
§ Administers the Student Evaluation Form (SEF) - Administered to a maximum of two (2) classes containing a different Population of enrolled students. The same student population may be used if the courses are not identical § If administering: - Shall be trained by means of the self-instruction package; - Shall be present during the administration of the SEF; - Shall collect all forms at the end of the session - Provides complete results to the evaluee
|
During the semester
Prior to March 15 |
F. Final Written Summary
(Includes information from Performance Observations and Student Evaluations)
Form F7.0(k)
|
Peer Evaluator
Evaluee UPM Advisor |
§ Writes a Final Summary Evaluation of the information provided through the Contractually agreed upon evaluation criteria, processes and instruments (Performance Observation & Student Evaluations)
Final Written Summary Evaluation includes: - Results from the evaluation processes; - Recommendations for individual improvement, if any;
§ Meets with the evaluee to show him/her the evaluation materials
§ Shows any recommendations for individual improvement to evaluee first
§ Submits all evaluation materials to supervising Vice President/Dean
§ Review Final Written Summary Evaluation and any recommendations for individual improvement with Peer Evaluator
§ Evaluee may attach his/her comments to the report before it is submitted to the appropriate District office; UPM Advisor may attach a separate statement, if he/she desires. |
Prior to April 15
Prior to April 15
Prior to April 15
By April 15
Prior to April 15
Prior to April 15 |
7-10
The unit member shall be evaluated using the forms, processes and criteria contractually agreed upon, as outlined below:
Process |
Team Member |
Responsibility |
Time Line |
|
B. Professional Self Evaluation
Alternating periods of three (3) years
Form F7.0 (h)
|
Evaluee
Manager UPM Advisor |
§ Chooses Peer Evaluator and notifies supervising Vice President/Dean
If Peer Evaluator not chosen within 30 days, supervising Vice President/Dean appoints Peer Evaluator.
§ Shall furnish the Manager, Peer Evaluator and UPM Advisor with a self evaluation as provided for on the Professional Self Evaluation Form.
§ Review Professional Self Evaluation |
Within 30 days of notice from the District
By March 15
Between March 15 and May 30
|
C. Student Evaluation
Forms F7.0 (e), (f), (g), as applicable
|
Peer Evaluator OR UPM Advisor
Manager UPM Advisor |
§ Administers the Student Evaluation Form (SEF) - Administered to a maximum of two (2) classes containing a different Population of enrolled students. The same student population may be used if the courses are not identical § If administering: - Shall be trained by means of the self-instruction package; - Shall be present during the administration of the SEF; - Shall collect all forms at the end of the session - Provides complete results to the evaluee
§ Review Student Evaluations |
During the semester
Prior to March 15
Between March 30 and May 30 |
7-11
The unit member shall be evaluated using the forms, processes and criteria contractually agreed upon, as outlined below:
G. Final Written Summary
(Includes information from Self Evaluation and Student Evaluations) |
Peer Evaluator
Evaluee UPM Advisor
|
§ Writes a Final Summary Evaluation of the information provided through the Contractually agreed upon evaluation criteria, processes and instruments (Self Evaluation & Student Evaluations)
Final Written Summary Evaluation includes: - Results from the evaluation processes; - Recommendations for individual improvement, if any;
§ Meets with the evaluee to show him/her the evaluation materials
§ Shows any recommendations for individual improvement to evaluee first
§ Submits all evaluation materials to supervising Vice President/Dean
§ Review Final Written Summary Evaluation and any recommendations for individual improvement with Peer Evaluator
§ Evaluee may attach his/her comments to the report before it is submitted to the appropriate District office; UPM Advisor may attach a separate statement, if he/she desires.
|
Prior to April 15
Prior to April 15
Prior to April 15
By April 15
Prior to April 15
Prior to April 15
|
7-12
7.4 – 7.4.3 Evaluation Procedures: Temporary Non-Credit Unit Member – Chart C
|
Process |
Team Member |
Responsibility |
Time Line |
|
A. Performance Observation
Frequency: During 1st year of employment
Form F7.0 (a) |
Evaluee
Peer Evaluator
UPM Advisor |
§ Chooses Peer Evaluator and notifies supervising Vice President/Dean
If Peer Evaluator not chosen by the 2nd Friday of the Quarter, supervising Vice President/Dean appoints Peer Evaluator
§ Makes the following available to the Peer Evaluator: - Syllabi - Sample of evaluation tool for measuring student progress
§ Makes classroom or other on-the-job visits at a time acceptable to the evaluee
§ Completes applicable form(s) – From F7.0(a)
§ Submits Evaluation Progress Report (Form F7.0 (j)) to supervising Vice President/Dean
§ Appointed by UPM/AFT § Advises evaluee in all phases of the evaluation process
|
By the 2nd Friday of the Quarter
Prior to Observation
During Quarter, as arranged
During visits
By the 4th Friday of the Quarter
On-going |
C. Student Evaluation
Frequency: 1st year of employment AND subsequent evaluations (Fall, Winter or Spring Quarters)
Form F7.0(e)
|
Peer Evaluator OR UPM Advisor OR Other Third Party
|
§ Administers the Student Evaluation Form (SEF) - 1st Year – Peer Evaluator administers to a maximum of two (2) classes containing a different population of enrolled students. The same student population may be used if the courses are not identical - Subsequent evaluations – Peer Evaluator OR UPM Advisor OR Third Party administer to at least one (1)course |
During the Quarter |
7-13
7.4 – 7.4.3 Evaluation Procedures: Temporary Non-Credit Unit Member – Chart C
|
Process |
Team Member |
Responsibility |
Time Line |
B. Student Evaluation(Continued)
Frequency: 1st year of employment AND subsequent evaluations (Fall, Winter or Spring Quarters)
Form F7.0(e)
|
Peer Evaluator OR UPM Advisor OR Other Third Party
Peer EvaluatorOR Manager
Manager
|
§ If administering: - Shall be trained by means of the self-instruction package; - Shall be present during the administration of the SEF; - Shall collect all forms at the end of the session - Provides complete results to the evaluee
§ Shares the results of the Student Evaluations with the instructor - 1st year – Peer Evaluator meets with evaluee - Subsequent evaluations – Manager meets with evaluee
§ Makes a recommendation on re-hire (each evaluation period) § Initiates a management/peer evaluation in the following quarter in accordance with Article 7.3 of the CBA, when the results of the Student Evaluations show cause for a possible recommendation to not re-hire
|
Prior to the end of the Academic Year
Prior to the end of the Academic Year
|
|
E. Final Written Summary
(Includes information from performance Observation and Student Evaluations)
Form F7.0(k) |
Peer Evaluator |
§ 1st Year – Writes a Final Summary Evaluation of the information provided through the contractually agreed upon evaluation criteria, processes and instruments ( Performance Observation and Student Evaluations) and submits to the supervising Vice President/Dean by the dates indicated in ‘Time Line’ |
Fall Qtr. – Nov. 15Winter Qtr. – March 31 Spring Quarter – May 31 |
7.4.4 Nursing Home Instructors. Evaluations conducted on a unit member who teaches in nursing homes do not require student evaluations. In the Fall of each year the Activity Director in the nursing home will respond to a set of questions specifically designed for nursing home faculty.
7-14
7.5 – 7.5.2 Evaluation Procedures: Community Service (fee-based) Unit Member – Chart D
|
Process |
Team Member |
Responsibility |
Time Line |
C. Student Evaluation
Frequency: At least one (1) time per year
Form F7.5
|
Third Party
Manager |
§ Administers the Student Evaluation Form (SEF), collects and seals in manila Envelope. Returns envelope to Community Education and Services Department.
§ If administering: - Shall be trained by means of the self-instruction package; - Shall be present during the administration of the SEF; - Shall collect all forms at the end of the session
§ Shares the results of the Student Evaluations with the instructor § Makes a recommendation on re-hire (each evaluation period)
|
By the end of the Quarter
Prior to the end of the Academic Year
|
7-15
7.6 – 7.6.3 Evaluation Procedures: Temporary Credit Unit Member – Chart E
|
Process |
Team Member |
Responsibility |
Time Line |
|
A. Performance Observation
Frequency: 1st semester of employment AND once every six (6) semesters of active service thereafter; May occur in any semester/work year and action dates may be adjusted for Spring evaluation
Second Evaluation: Evaluee or any member of evaluation team may request a second evaluation be made in the same academic/work year.
Additional Evaluation Team Member: An ETCUM/Retired ETCUM may request that the Department Chairperson serve on the evaluation team or he/she may volunteer.
Forms: F7.0 (a), (b), (c), (d) – as applicable |
Manager
Manager UPM Advisor Peer Evaluator (if applicable)
Manager UPM Advisor Peer Evaluator (if applicable)
UPM Advisor
Evaluee
|
§ Schedules classroom or other on-the-job visits (e.g. counselors, librarians, school nurse and/or other unit member) at a time acceptable to evaluee
§ Makes classroom or other on-the-job visits jointly
§ Completes applicable form(s)
§ Appointed by UPM/AFT
§ Advises evaluee in all phases of the evaluation
§ Chooses a peer evaluator (permanent unit member) to serve on the team, if Desired
§ Makes the following available to the team: Syllabi Sample of evaluation tool for measuring student progress
|
ASAP in the Semester
ASAP in the Semester
During Visits
ASAP in the Semester
On-going
ASAP in the Semester
Prior to Observation
|
7-16
7.6 – 7.6.3 Evaluation Procedures: Temporary Credit Unit Member – Chart E
|
Process |
Team Member |
Responsibility |
Time Line |
B. Student Evaluation
Purpose: To provide each unit member and the evaluator with feedback about student perceptions of his/her teaching.
Frequency: 1st semester of employment AND once every six (6) semesters of active service thereafter; May occur in any semester/work year and action dates may be adjusted for Spring evaluation
Form: Student Evaluation Form (SEF 7.0 (e), (f), (g) – as applicable
|
Manager/ Designee OR UPM Advisor |
§ Administers Student Evaluation Form (SEF) - Administered to one (1) randomly selected class
§ If administering: - Shall be trained by means of the self-instruction package; - Shall be present during the administration of SEF; - Shall collect all forms at the end of the session.
|
ASAP in the Semester
|
|
E. Final Written Summary
(Includes information from Performance Observation and Student Evaluations)
Form F7.0 (k) |
Manager |
§ Writes a Final Summary Evaluation of the information provided through the Contractually agreed upon evaluation criteria, processes and instruments (Performance Observation, Student Evaluations)
Final Written Summary Evaluation includes: - Results from the evaluation processes; - Manager evaluation of indices outside the classroom or job site; - Suggestion for improvement, if any; § Recommendation concerning re-employment (each evaluation period)
§ Submits all evaluation materials to Human Resources
|
ASAP in the Semester
ASAP in the Semester
ASAP in the Semester |
7-17
7.6 – 7.6.3 Evaluation Procedures: Temporary Credit Unit Member
|
Process |
Team Member |
Responsibility |
Time Line |
H. Final Written Summary(Continued)
Form F7.0 (k) |
Evaluee UPM Advisor |
§ Review Final Written Summary Evaluation together § Evaluee may attach comments to Managers Report; UPM Advisor may attach Separate Statement to Manager’s Report
|
ASAP in the Semester |
7-18
6-9