Newsletter
Home Page    Benefits    Forms Committees
CoM News
Contract    By-Laws    UPM Jobs Salary Sch.
CFT Constitution
CoM Weather    Calender    Campus Events
e-mail Faculty
May 2003 Newsletter
C

O

N

T

E

N

T

S

Administration's Layoff Plan

UPM Responds to Layoffs

Grievance Officer's Report

News from Beyond Marin

Treasurer's Report

Benefits

View the old contract from this link. 1999-2000 Contract

Real-Time CoM Weather

CoM in the News

Campus Events

e-mail CoM Faculty

College Forms on-line

Back to Home Page

Ponderings of the President

by Ira Lansing
Ponderings of the President

And once again itÕs time for AmericaÕs favorite game show Ñ In Jeopardy! And here is your host for today, Alex Kavetch!

Alex: Thank you, Don and thank you studio audience. LetÕs see who we have with us today. Contestant #1, tell us about yourself.

#1: Hi, Alex! IÕm a former Enron executive with lots of time on my hands. I read extensively and I am pretty good competing with the players on TV, so I thought I would give the real thing a try. Plus, the winnings would be a big help.

Alex: Thank you and good luck. Contestant #2, who are you?

#2: Hi, Alex! IÕm a former WorldComm executive with lots of time on my hands. I read extensively and I am pretty good competing with the players on TV, so I thought I would give the real thing a try. Plus, the winnings would be a big help.

Alex: IÕm sure you will have lots of fun today. Player #3, what can you tell us about yourself?

#3: Hi, Alex! IÕm a former California teacher with lots of time on my hands. I read extensively and I am pretty good competing with the players on TV, so I thought I would give the real thing a try. Plus, the winnings would be a big help.

Alex: There you have it, three players eager to get started and all of you look like you can do very well for yourselves. So letÕs see what are the categories for todayÕs In Jeopardy. We have ÒRhymes with T,Ó ÒBy the Numbers,Ó ÒRebuilding AfghanistanÓÉ Excuse me players, I was just informed that last category has no money in it and will be replaced with ÒRebuilding Iraq,Ó and the last category will be ÒStatements by Boards of Trustees.Ó Contestant #2, you won the coin toss back stage, so pick your category. And remember players, be sure all of your responses are in the form of a question.

#2: Thank you Alex. LetÕs try ÒRebuilding IraqÓ for $200.

Alex: Energy company awarded without bid a multimillion dollar contract.

[ring]

#1: Who is Enron?

[buzz incorrect]

#3: Who is Haliburton?

Alex: Correct, but I see why you first answered as you did. Go ahead and pick your category.

#3: LetÕs try ÒBy the NumbersÓ for $400

Alex: Two and one-half.

[ring]

#3: What is the number of hours the community members spent addressing the Marin Community College Board of Trustees in opposition to the layoffs and service reductions.

Alex: Correct. Choose again.

#3: ÒBy the NumbersÓ for a thousand.

Alex 18

[ring]

#3: How many ÒwhereasÕsÓ are there in the statement of no confidence against Superintendent/President James E. Middleton?

Alex: Correct. Pick again.

#3: ÒBy the NumbersÓ for $200.

Alex: One

[ring]

#3: How many items regarding the vote of no confidence did the Marin Independent Journal highlight in its follow-up article?

Alex: Correct. Choose again.

#3: LetÕs go with a new category and try ÒStatements by Boards of TrusteesÓ for one thousand.

Alex: And the Jeopardy answer is ÒThis is an opportunity to make positive long-range improvements in the institution between the administration, staff, faculty and Board of Trustees. Our goal is to develop a system to ensure a more opendialogue and deepened collaboration as we work together. The Board has made, and will continue to make, progress on adopting important policy decisions for the future of College of Marin. We also recognized the significant contributions of faculty, staff, administration and Dr. Middleton toward meeting these goals. This situation provides us with a unique opportunity to improve the health of the institution through more inclusive decision making. A meaningful open dialogue is required. The Board supports the need for improved stewardship by the President/Superintendent, staff, faculty and Board.Ó

[ring]

#1: What statement was made by the Marin Community College Board of Trustees after energy prices skyrocketed?

[incorrect buzzer]

[ring]

#2: What statement was made by the Marin Community College Board of Trustees after a bond measure failed and its campuses were devastated by the Great California Earthquake?

[incorrect buzzer]

[ring]

#3: What statement was made by the Marin Community College Board of Trustees after almost 90% of the voting faculty expressed no confidence in the superintendent/presidentÕs practices, policies or ability to lead the college with effectiveness or vision.

Alex: That is correct, but it looks like were about out of time for now. But remember, you can always play along with us and you too will be In Jeopardy!
College of Marin. Despite these pleas, the trustees voted to approve the issuance of the notices (the vote to approve was not unanimous, but did have a majority). The letters of termination were mailed within the next two days.

During the same meeting President Middleton offered the observation that if the public were as willing to financially support the programs as they were to address the need for them, perhaps something could be done. Indeed, about $1 million dollars could rescind all the layoff notices, and the college would be willing to match dollar for dollar, any public contributions, up to $500,000. Middleton then went on to say that an across the board salary cut of 2% would generate the college's share of the half million dollars.

Don't grab (or clutch) your wallets and purses yet. As UPM President, I addressed the Board of Trustees on a proposed negotiable retirement incentive. I presented a brief overview that showed how the retirement incentive alone could generate up to $500,000, and that through negotiations these savings could be used to save the jobs of our members. Only two trustees questioned the proposal, one to ask "Really?" and the other if the concept had been presented to management. The answer to both was "yes." As I write this one week later, no indication has come from the administration that they are interested in discussing the matter. As I write this, both the District and the Union will endure the time and expense associated with termination notices being sent. Sadly, these individuals who have made valuable contributions to the college may not be here next fall. And ultimately it is their students and the community at large who will lose the most.

Upon further reflection I realize there are still other associations with the calendar months. Most everyone is familiar with the rhyme "April showers bring May flowers." But are you aware of its companion description for March: comes in like a lion and goes out like a lamb? So far half of the image seems to be correct. We shall see how it plays out. As always, pay attention and be informed. You do not want to be reflecting on why Caesar uttered "et tu, Brute?"

UPM Responds to Layoffs
UPM Assists ÒPinkedÓ Faculty

No one represented by the United Professors of Marin goes it alone, especially in difficult times. On March 15th, fifteen full-time members of the faculty experienced one of the most disheartening and frightening events in a professional career: the arrival of a layoff notice. Eleven of these work in the ChildrenÕs Center, three work in the Disabled StudentsÕ Program, and one works in Basic Education/GED. While the final outcome of this lousy situation is yet to be determined (the State budget is not final by any means), the faculty affected by these circumstances have had, at least, support from the union.

When the word ÒlayoffÓ was first used with serious intent, the UPM Executive Council charged Grievance Officer Arthur Lutz with special responsibility to ensure fair treatment under the Collective Bargaining Agreement for the affected faculty, to represent all eleven instructors in meetings with administrators, to communicate between those instructors and the Exec, and to shuttle between the UPM attorney Bob Bezemek and the union in all matters regarding this layoff. LutzÕs voluntary position was modeled after the one assumed by Ira Lansing during the Great Illegal Layoffs conducted in 1985 when over 90 members of the faculty were issued pink slips.

Although no layoff proceeding can ever have a happy ending, Arthur LutzÕs efforts and the focused attention of the UPM Executive Council have yielded some solid and useful results. In the case of the eleven ChildrenÕs Center faculty, the District has agreed to extend medical benefit coverage through July and August of this year. Further, formal hearings for each laid-off instructor have been waived, avoiding that costly and often very difficult experience. More significantly, the UPM discovered that the District had conducted an inaccurate ÒlotteryÓ to establish the instructorsÕ date of first employment, a significant date that may be used as the foundation of reemployment rights. The District agreed to rescind the results of the lottery and to correct the dates in a manner satisfactory to all laid off faculty.

In the case of the Disabled Students Program and Basic Ed faculty, the District agreed to conduct involuntary transfers, thus avoiding loss of jobs for those who received pink slips. Arthur Lutz represented each DSP faculty member during individual meetings held by Maggie Rumford. In these meetings, the details of the instructorsÕ reassignments were hammered out, and all the while their rights under the Contract were closely guarded. In the end, two instructors were transferred to English Skills and one was transferred to Computer Information Systems. The fourth laid-off instructor, in the end, was able to keep his position.

Unfortunately, reassignments were not possible for ChildrenÕs Center faculty whose teaching specialty did not extend to other faculty service areas.

There is no such thing as a good layoff. But in such bad times, the UPM acts to ensure basic rights and to seek just results.


Election Results for the UPM Executive Council
The ballots have been counted, and we can announce the winners:
John Sutherland
Arthur Lutz
Mike Ransom
Congratulations to each!

Theo Fung, current Exec member, withdrew her bid for re-election to ensure that new people could take seats on the Exec.

Grievance Officer's Report
by Arthur Lutz

Sumer is icumen in,
Lhoude sing cuccu.
(Anon. C.1250)
The cuckoo-bird has long
been considered the bird that heralds the arrival of summer. But at the College of Marin, cuckoo might also be the bird that best describes some recently occurring events.

For example: President Middleton announced that the State budget crisis forced him to lay off the entire faculty and staff of our ChildrenÕs Centers, but he found hundreds of thousands of dollars to spend on a new marketing department.

And disabled students were told that there was no money to continue many of their classes, but a whole new costly layer of administrative directors was installed.

And Dr. Middleton lamented that there were not enough young people in Marin County to make our enrollment grow, but he advised us to discourage students from enrolling in our classes if they signed up late.

How many examples of the cuckoo-bird have YOU observed over the past ten years?

A facilities plan before we have an educational master plan? A celebration praising our history followed by an immediate attempt to sell our historic campuses? Suggestions that we build a high-rise parking garage on the Kentfield campus disguised as a library? Throwing millions of dollars, year after year, into the black hole of CCMISC/Buzzeo software, after being told by IT experts that the system might be a scam?

The sightings of cuckoo had grown so numerous that our faculty felt compelled to go on record in protest, and early this month almost 90% of those voting declared no confidence in Dr. Middleton, no confidence in his policies, and no confidence in his ability to continue to lead our college. The no confidence resolution was affirmed by our Academic Senate and was read to our Board of Trustees on April 8th.

Unfortunately, the BoardÕs response might be characterized as a cross between the cry of the parrot and the call of the mocking bird. They parroted and defended Dr. MiddletonÕs excuses and failures, and they mocked the depth and seriousness of our facultyÕs concern. ÒSome institutional corrective action may be necessary and will be considered...Ó they cautiously peeped.

Did they suggest INSTITUTIONAL corrective action? Our faculty does not believe that there is anything wrong with our institution. ItÕs BIG BIRD and his policies that our faculty wants the Board to correct! How much faculty concern must there be before our Board stops acting like the proverbial ostrich?

If the foregoing paragraphs seem overly derisive it may be because, as UPM Grievance Officer, IÕve just come from meetings with more than fifteen of our full time faculty whose lives are being turned upside down because of Dr. MiddletonÕs personnel recommendations. Most of these colleagues have been teaching at our college for years. Many wonÕt be back next semester. Neither will many fledgling and adjunct faculty whom we have befriended over the years. It will be a great and unnecessary loss for us and for our college, the culmination of ten years of our administrationÕs educational and fiscal blundering and flights of fancy.

Our Union is doing its best to help these unit members in these difficult times, but our mandate is limited by the terms of our CBA. ItÕs truly up to the faculty to continue to Òsing lhoudeÓ if there are to be meaningful changes at the College of Marin.


News from Beyond Marin

California Federation of Teachers Endorses Budget Accountability Act
Signatures Needed

Are you tired of the attacks on public education? Are you angered by the layoff notices and reductions in classes occurring across the state? Are you tired of the partisan gridlock in Sacramento?

There is a way to protect public education and to improve the state budget process. ItÕs called the ÒBudget Accountability Act.Ó It is a proposed initiative being circulated for the March 2004 primary election.

The initiative is a proactive response to the partisan gridlock in Sacramento. Only by changing the rules of the budget process will we be able to hold our elected officials accountable. This will also improve the chances for good public policy that reflects the needs and desires of the people of California.

It has five parts:

¥ It will reduce the amount of votes necessary to pass a budget to 55 percent, the same number that is required to pass a school bond.

¥ If the Legislature and Governor fail to pass the budget in sex months, they will forfeit their salary, perdiem allowance, and care allowance for each day after the deadline until the budget is adopted and signed into law.

¥ The initiative will also help the budgeting process by requiring the state to create a Òrainy day fundÓ of 5 percent in years when revenues exceed the amount needed to fund existing services.

¥ Provides for the Legislative Ethics Committees to censure party leaders if they punish a legislator for voting for a state budget.

¥ Requires the State Controller, in consultation with the Department of Finance and the Legislative AnalystÕs Office, to prepare a budge summary which will be published in the state ballot pamphlet.

The California Federation of Teachers is working with other public sector unions, health advocates, and the League of Women Voters to qualify this initiative. Initiative supporters will be circulating petitions on campus and in the community. Make sure you sign the initiative and volunteer to help your union ensure that it passes at the ballot box.



Treasurer's Report

Cash Flow Report 1/1/03 Through 3/31/03


1/1/03 Percent of
Category Description 3/31/03 Total

Inflows
Dues & Assessments 36,245.69 69.36%
CFT/AFT Grants 12,047.39 23.05%
Legal Defense Fund Acct. 3,712.98 7.10%
Interest Income 254.11 0.49%

Total Inflows 52,260.17 100.00%

Outflows

Fed/State Tax w/h, Salary 1,186.10 2.48%
Service Charge 30.00 0.06%
Wells Fargo Payroll Service 340.31 0.71%
Payment to Affiliates 18,381.58 38.46%
Attorney 14,092.30 29.49%
Contributions 97.80 0.20%
Duplicating and Printing 167.26 0.35%
Medical Employee Benefit 870.84 1.82%
Insurance 1,526.96 3.20%
Meeting Costs 355.31 0.74%
Postage 104.60 0.22%
Salary 5,792.82 12.12%
Hourly Employee(s) 4,749.89 9.94%
Telephone 94.46 0.20%

Total Outflows 47,790.23 100.00%

Overall Total 4,469.94


Benefits of Membership

In an era of layoffs, votes of no confidence, and program reductions, life is definitely unpredictable. But itÕs not a time to withdraw; itÕs a time to unite with colleagues. Becoming an active member of the United Professors of Marin might be one of the most significant steps you can take to put some order to the uncertainty, to show your support for those colleagues ? both part time and full time ? whose jobs are on the line. And by joining, you can benefit from representation on not only the local level but also the state and national levels through corresponding membership in the CFT and the AFT. With that comes many benefits, including plans for other kinds of uncertainty in life.


Web Page graphics & design by Mike Godsey, windfind@sonic.nett

 Forms
Forms
  1. AFFIDAVIT FOR ENROLLMENT OF DOMESTIC PARTNERS FORM
  2. APPLICATION FOR SABBATICAL LEAVE FORM
  3. GUIDELINES FOR SABBATICAL APPLICATIONS
  4. "SLIDING SCALE" FOR EVALUATING SABBATICAL LEAVE PROPOSALS
  5. REQUEST FOR UNPAID LEAVE
  6. VOLUNTARY TRANSFER AGREEMENT
  7. INVOLUNTARY TRANSFER AGREEMENT Form
  8. ASSIGNED HOURS AND SUBSTITUTE ARRANGEMENTS FORM
  9. ASSIGNMENTS
  10. DISTRICT DIRECTED ASSIGNMENTS
  11. INSTRUCTIONAL PERFORMANCE OBSERVATION FORM
  12. HEALTH CENTER NURSE PERFORMANCE OBSERVATION FORM