Newsletter

   
 
 
Ponderings of the President

 

 

 

 

by Ira Lansing

Author’s note: it may seem that the characteristics described in this column apply only to permanent faculty and not to part-time credit or noncredit. Regardless, the objectives apply to all.

Towards the end of this spring semester I had the pleasure of attending two graduations. One was for students at the College of Marin, the other was for my own daughter at San Rafael High School. While both events were joyous celebrations for the participants, families and friends, there was a noticeable difference in the nature of the observable exuberance at each graduation.

At the conclusion of each matriculation the students’ behaviors were markedly different. At the College of Marin there was a tone of relief and satisfaction that was low key and almost dignified. Students and families mingled, warmly sharing hugs and smiles. At San Rafael the students were darting around frenetically, shrieking with joy. One group of about 8 boys even formed a circle and did a "bulldog" (the school mascot) chant and spell-out. The atmosphere was one of relief; a "finally it’s over" kind of feeling. At the college there was certainly relief, but a very strong sense of "there is still a lot more to come".

Quite clearly a large part of the difference in emotions is related to the age of the participants. High school graduates are nearly uniformly 17 to 18 years old, while College of Marin graduates can range from younger to considerably older, and probably average in their late twenties. The high school student may know there is a long road of school and work ahead of them, but the completion of 12 years of elementary, middle and high schools seems like such a long journey that the future labors cannot compare; an end has arrived. On the other hand, the College of Marin graduate recognizes their degree is a springboard to another degree or another job; more of the same.

I see a very strong parallel between these two types of graduates and our own faculty at the College of Marin. There is a group that has a sense of exuberance with a perspective that it’s finally over. There is another that feels there is a lot more of the same. Ironically, unlike the ages associated with the graduates who have these perspectives, the ages of the faculty with these characteristics seems to be reversed. The joy of final accomplishment resides with those nearing retirement, while the springboard to more adventures in teaching lies with the younger faculty and those more recently hired. As members of the United Professors of Marin, it is important we all recognize that these differences exist, yet still try to create a work environment that serves everyone. This objective creates interesting dilemmas while negotiating a new contract.

Hopefully in the next few months the UPM bargaining team will bring back to the membership for review and approval a new collective bargaining agreement. Everyone will look to see what’s in it for them. Of course we all want more money. But do we see it with the eye of the near-retirees who want to maximize their retirement benefit; or do we look at it as someone who sees many more automatic step increases and contract raises still to come?

But there is much more to a contract than just the dollars and benefits it provides. There are working conditions and these cut across all age groups. These non-monetary parts of the contract are elements that we all perform with every day we are on the job. They affect all of us regardless of age, regardless of where we are in our careers. The only difference may be that there are many faculty who can remember what it was like when some or all of the contract language was not a part of their employment, while others have never known it to be otherwise. For this reason it is important that all of us not take any aspect of our collective bargaining agreement for granted. We all need to understand that, as convoluted as it may be at times, the contract is there to protect us, to assist us and to provide an atmosphere where we can all do our jobs to the best of our ability with the least amount of interference; where we can do the most for our students with the most that is available, and with more to come.

It is easier as someone who has been there to see the differences between the high school graduate and the college graduate. However, as faculty we too readily become blind to the same differences that exist amongst our colleagues. To achieve a successful contract, an agreement that benefits all of us, we must acknowledge the different desires; remember, support and preserve the past accomplishments, and work together to achieve our future goals, whatever they may be.

Hmm, did this column just drift into a graduation speech? Well, it may be the only time I will ever be given the opportunity to deliver one to a nearly captive audience. So thank you for your attention and now go out there and have fun, but be safe, be informed and enjoy the summer! Before you know it, like many of our own high school and college graduates, you will be back in school.

 

 

  Collective Bargaining Update

Collective Bargaining continues through the summer, although little headway has been made. Newly appointed permanent VP of Fiscal Services, Al Harrison, has answered some of the Bargaining Committee’s questions, but continues to offer contradictory information.

Income to the college has increased by more than 5% per year over the past several years and the College is not, as yet, in compliance with the 50% law; and yet so far the District is only prepared to offer faculty a 1% salary increase this year. The District claims that it will be in compliance with the 50% law by the end of the year, even though teacher’s salaries have been declining (due to significant faculty retirements) while non-instructional expenditures have been increasing.

The District’s budgeting system is - in the words of Al Harrison -"weak." This is not an unreasonable assertion. It was revealed that the $3.2 million dollars in Child Development expenditures in fact reflected expenditures in other areas as well, including part-time salaries. Whether this is deliberate obfuscation or mere incompetence has not been determined.

Stay tuned, attend Board Meetings and make your voice heard. It is time for us to put the "united" into United Professors of Marin.

AFT Offers Health Club Discount

Have you been talking about
exercising more this summer, but don’t like the high costs of joining a gym? To help you and your family take better care of yourselves and save money on monthly health club fees, AFT PLUS now offers a health club discount program. The program offers pre-negotiated 20 to 60 percent discounts on monthly fees at over 1,500 health clubs nationwide. There are no long-term commitments to the program and your membership can be cancelled at any time. You can even freeze your membership in the program and activate it at a later date.

Members rave about also having the ability to transfer their membership between participating health clubs for a small $10 fee. Call 888/294-1500 or visit www.unionplus.org/healthclubs<outbind://6/www.unionplus.org/healthclubs> to learn more about the program. Make this your summer to get healthier.


Connecting the Dots

Arthur Lutz

Trodding the Boards

During the 1930’s at amateur vaudeville shows, managers kept a long hook in the wings to drag performers off the stage if they were not sufficiently entertaining. It didn’t matter how earnest or persistent the players were; if they couldn’t amuse the audience, they’d be yanked off.

And so, getting the hook means being fired, dismissed, silenced or rejected, especially suddenly, and often when you think things are going pretty well.

That’s exactly what our Board of Trustees did to our faculty following Dr. Middleton’s forced resignation two years ago. After Middleton’s departure, the Board decided they had better listen to the sentiments of our faculty. So they invited several of us to a round table discussion to voice our concerns and offer suggestions on how to improve COM. Those of us who participated in this ‘command performance’ had high hopes that our presentation would be useful to the Board and perhaps would lead to further dialogue.

But alas, we got the hook. Evidently, the Trustees didn’t find us amusing enough, so, as in the old vaudeville days, we were ignominiously yanked off stage. And we’ve never been invited back for a repeat performance.

And that’s the state of affairs that exists today. It appears that our Trustees would rather be entertained by consultants who can amuse them and tell them what they’d like to hear, than listen to the more sober judgments of our faculty.

The latest of the razzle-dazzle entertainer/consultants to trod the boards is Bud Allen of the CCS Group, whom our Board just hired to facilitate COM’s new Educational Master Plan. Dr. Allen is bright, witty and engaging, so despite the fact that he knows little or nothing of COM’s history or ‘culture,’ and despite the appeal made by our Academic Senate president that one of our own faculty should lead this important task, Dr. Allen was chosen as top banana.

Who knows how long he’ll be around, however, because entertainer/consultants at COM seem to come and go like a band of traveling carnies. Dr. Gilliland performed his act for a while and now he is gone. And likewise Bernie Blackman. And whatever happened to that logo lady – or the numerous other players who appeared center stage briefly and then disappeared? Like the troupe of strolling players in Kiss Me Kate, they perform here today then move to another venue tomorrow.

"We open in Venice,

We next play Verona,

Then on to Cremona…

Then Mantua, then Padua

Then we open again, WHERE?"

(Perhaps Los Rios, or Laney, or Skyline?)

When I was a kid, my dad would take me to see the circus. And before the main event began we would wander into the side-show tents to see the fat lady and the sword swallower and Johnny/Joanne - half man/half woman. And for an extra nickel I got to sit on the lap of the great Jack Johnson, the first black heavyweight champion, who was old and down on his luck and who for ten cents would let people punch him in the gut as hard as they could. And for fifty cents he would sell you his finger ring which was large enough to fit over my wrist. Johnson was a giant of a man and a great and intelligent champion who was hounded from the prize ring by racism. If nothing else, it taught me how lucky I was to be born thin and un-deformed and loved.

But side-shows are no longer politically correct, except, it seems at our community college where consultants still perform their routines for us rubes and then move on and set up tents at another location. It’s hardly different from the old days of Jim Middleton, when we had Buzzeo and Digital Village Associates and Scenario Planning and the Fish Philosophers, all tap dancing and singing and doing ‘shtick’ (while our Trustees were ignoring the unfunded liability gorilla that lurked just outside the tent.) And now one of these trustees is running for the State Assembly. That’s show biz!

It’s shameful the way our administration continues to be persuaded to hire pricey outside consultants when we have a faculty who are equally capable and who are far more understanding of our institution’s needs. Our new president should consider straightening this mess out, before those of us in the cheap seats get restless and think about calling for the old vaudeville hook.