The

Union Press

Newsletter for the Faculty of the Marin Community College District
American Federation of Teachers, Local 1610

College Forms on-line | Back to Home Page

1997 Newsletters: Jan. Feb. March April May June/July Sept Oct Nov

C

O

N

T

N

T

S

December Headlines

General Meeting

Ponderings of the President

Preparations for new contract

Committees & Officers

Hudson Report Delayed

Benefits of Membership

Articles

General Meeting

Ponderings

New contract

Committees & Officers

Hudson Report

Benefits of Membership

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Articles

General Meeting

Ponderings

New contract

Committees & Officers

Hudson Report

Benefits of Membership

Don't Miss It!

UPM's Flextime

A General Meeting of the Members

Friday January 16, 1998

12:30 to 1:15

Fussleman Hall, 120

Refreshments will be Available!

 

Bargaining Questionnaire

The Collective Bargaining Team needs your input and direction for bargaining the new contract.

The first step in the process of preparing for negotiations is to pinpoint issues of concern shared by faculty. After this step has been taken, the Bargaining Team may seek from you more detailed responses about your ideas and concerns.

The list below identifies the articles of the Contract. Mark those articles that you would like to see modified or amended. Then, in the space provided, describe what you would like changed or amended and why. If you need more room for your recommendations, please attach another sheet and specify the Article you refer to.

Finally, remove this page from the newsletter and return it to the UPM office via intercampus mail. The survey must be received by the Bargaining Team no later than

February 2, 1998.

Check Article Recommended Modifications

Article I: RECOGNITION

(Unit positions; distribution of

Reassigned Time)

 

Article II: PAYROLL DEDUCTIONS

(Authorization for deductions

 

Article III: WAGES

(Formulas, placement, management

teaching salaries, etc.)

 

Article IV: FRINGE BENEFITS

 

Article V: LEAVES

(Reporting Absences, Sick Leaves, Substitution,

Personal Necessity, Unpaid, Bereavement, Military,

Accident, Disability, Honorary, Assault Leaves, and

Unit Banking)

 

Article VI: TRANSFERS AND ASSIGNMENTS

(Transfers, District-directed, Relocation, RETCUM

& ETCUM status)

 

Article VII: EVALUATION

(Criteria, Procedures, Regular and Temporary Unit

Members, Personnel Files)

 

Article VIII: WORKLOAD

(Workload Credit, Reassigned Time, Overload, Stipends,

Office Hours, Department Chairs, Reduced Load,

Management Employees, Intersession)

 

Article IX: CALENDAR

(Staff Development, Flex Time)

 

Article X: CLASS SIZE

(Minimum Class Size, Maximum Class Size, Class Cancellation)

 

Article XI: SAFETY

(Safety Committee, Procedures, Training)

 

Article XII: GRIEVANCE

(Definitions, Grievance Filing, Time Limits,

Appeal Process)

 

Article XIII: BOARD/AGENCY RELATIONS

(Communications)

Article XIV: DISTRICT RIGHTS

Article XV: REDUCTION IN FORCE

(Bumping Rights, Re-employment Rights,

Competency Criteria, Faculty Service Area)

 

Article XVI: UPGRADING OF PART-TIME FACULTY

(Part-time/Full-time Ratio, Ranking of Disciplines)

 

Article XVII: ACADEMIC FREEDOM

 

Article XVIII: NON-DISCRIMINATION

 

Article XIX: SEVERABILITY

 

Article XX: CONCERTED ACTIVITIES

(No-strike Clause)

 

Article XXI: REPRESENTATION/SERVICE FEE

(Employee Rights, Re-employment Rights, Competency

Criteria, Faculty Service Areas)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

One can only hope that calendar, decade or millennium's end prompted Stephen J. Ceci after 20 years to consider how his teaching style might be affecting his students' ability to learn.

 

 

Articles

General Meeting

Ponderings

New contract

Committees & Officers

Hudson Report

Benefits of Membership

 

Ponderings of the President

The end of the calendar year is often a time when one engages in retrospective analysis and prospective anticipation. Not one to miss the way of things, this month this column will afford the reader an opportunity to glance sideways. Reproduced below in its entirety is an article that appeared in the December, 1997, issue of Scientific American:

Evaluation Evaluations

How accurate are student evaluations of instructors? Many university administrators value them enough to consult them in making tenure and pay decisions. But a new study shows that students give the highest marks to the most enthusiastic-and not necessarily the best-teachers. Stephen J. Ceci of Cornell University taught developmental psychology twice one year. In the fall, he gave his lectures as he had for the past two decades. In the spring, he did the same but changed the pitch in his voice and used more gestures. Second-semester students found Ceci not only more knowledgeable and tolerant but more fair, organized and accessible. And they claimed to have learned more, even though they did no better than first-semester students on the same exams.

Ceci's study alone could give me a few columns of material. But this being the holiday season where some people exchange gifts, first let me offer something for the person who has everything. This gift suggestion comes from Volume XIII, Number 2 of Thought & Action, The NEA Higher Education Journal. In this Fall 1997 issue there is a review by Jill A. Jackson of the scholarly text The Erotics of Instruction (edited by Regina Barreca and Deborah Deneholz Morse, University Press of New England, 1997). The reviewer explains the contents of the book by stating "[i]n their preface, the editors write: 'What needs to be recognized is, first, that acts of learning and teaching are acts of desire and passion,' thus setting the stage for 13 essays that explore the seductive force that grips the pursuers and the purveyors of knowledge." Lest you recklessly rush out to purchase this tome, let me give a warning statement from the reviewer: "This ground-breaking book is controversial and may entice or enrage the reader. But despite the emotional reaction to the material, the reader will be challenged to think-like it or not."

Regular readers of this column recognize that I could not pass up two observations like those cited above. If for no other reason they serve to remind us that the real world is often stranger and more exciting than anything imaginable. And also, perhaps, that some people have a lot of time on their hands. One can only hope that calendar, decade or millennium's end prompted Stephen J. Ceci after 20 years to consider how his teaching style might be affecting his students' ability to learn. The fact that he got a publication out of it was a bonus. Furthermore, The Erotics of Instruction could remind all of us that we do have a relationship with our students, and that any relationship requires freshening up, something to make it sexier, if you would (the reviewer of the aforementioned book says that the majority of the contributors were instructors of English, so perhaps these folks are already doing what needs to be done). It is too easy just to do the same old thing and take everyone for granted. Their faces change each semester, how about ours? I am not one for New Year's resolutions; resolutions are best done when necessary instead of waiting for some cyclical event. However, if you are looking for one, how about resolving to change how you make your students think. Try that new approach, offer that alternative method, modulate your voice, look alive and wear that zippy outfit. Apparently it all can influence perception, and perception can contribute to one's ability to learn (Ceci's results not withstanding). You may also find that you too, are feeling better, have become more organized and more accessible. Relationships do go both ways, remember.

It could just get exciting around the old place next semester. Until then, here's hoping that next month and beyond finds you in good health.

 

 

 

Articles

General Meeting

Ponderings

New contract

Committees & Officers

Hudson Report

Benefits of Membership

Preparations Begin for Negotiating a New Contract

The UPM Needs Your Input

The semester break serves as the brief hiatus between the end of discussion about "re-openers" for the third year of the current contract and the beginning of negotiations for an entirely new Contract. Although negotiations for the new Collective Bargaining Agreement won't begin until June of 1998, the first steps that lead to those talks must be taken now. Probably the single most important step of them all is the first: The UPM Bargaining Team is soliciting your ideas, priorities, and concerns that will serve as a foundation for bargaining.

In a pull-out sheet within this newsletter is a questionnaire addressed to members of the UPM. This questionnaire gives you the opportunity to identify the general areas of the Contract that you would like to see modified. Be sure to return the questionnaire to the UPM by February 2, 1998. It is likely that the Bargaining Team, after tallying the responses, will seek your help in refining the scope of the identified issues in order to devise specific positions for negotiations.

Following those actions, the UPM will send a demand letter to the District whose representatives will then "sunshine" our proposals during a Board of Trustees meeting. At that Board meeting, reactions and concerns expressed by the community will be solicited. Then, those steps will be repeated when the District airs its position in response to the UPM's proposals. Once both sides have sunshined their demands, negotiations will begin, probably in June.

To get the wheels in motion, the Bargaining Team is asking for your help. Take a close look at the questionnaire, record your ideas on it, and return it to the UPM as soon as possible but no later than February 2, 1998. Changes in the Contract cannot occur unless you tell your representatives what those changes should be.

 

 President

  • Ira Lansing (x7531)

Treasurer

  • Theo Fung (x7389)

Newspaper Editor

  • Larry Tjernel (x8228)

Budget Monitor

  • Jeff Kamler (x7654)

Executive Secretary

  • Edie Yachechak (x7754)

Grievance Officer

  • Bernadine Allen (x8229)

Committees:

Bay Faculty Association (Bay 10)

  • Tom Menendez

Collective Bargaining Team (CB)

  • Paul Christensen (Chief Negotiator)
  • Jeff Kamler x7654
  • Hank Fearnley x7602
  • Don Foss x7523

 Health and Safety

  • Don Foss (x7523)
  • Walter Lager

Marin Labor Council

  • Arthur Lutz

PROFESSIONAL AFFAIRS COMMITTEE

  • Carl Cox x7423
  • Hank Fearnley x7602

Professional Standards (PSC)

  • Barbara Cancilla
  • Paul Christensen (x7635)

Sabbatical Leave

  • Barbara Bonander x7351
  • Ted Bright x7512
  • Barbara Cancilla x7327
  • Steve Jabloner

Staff Development

  • Alice Rocky (x7586)
  • Norm Pacula x7497

Workload (UDWC)

  • Jamie Deneris
  • Don Foss (x7523)
  •  

WEB MASTER

  • Mike Godsey x7402

Updated Jan. 21, 1998

Articles

General Meeting

Ponderings

New contract

Committees & Officers

Hudson Report

Benefits of Membership

 Hudson Report Delayed by Required Audit

The Hudson Report is a document that is prepared routinely by the UPM and sent to all CoM unit members who are not actual members of the UPM, AFT Local 1610. The report identifies any expenditure of agency fees for the purpose of non-union (political action) activities. Non-members are not required to have any of their fees used in such manner. Agency fees are not used for any political action activities locally by the UPM, but the State and National affiliates often do expend portions of collected dues for such purposes.

The report, however, has been delayed by the need to conduct a routine audit of the UPM's books. Every three years, the UPM conducts an outside audit, and the results of the audit must be collected before the Hudson report can be mailed. Only non-UPM unit members will receive the Hudson report, probably next month.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Articles

 Benefits of Membership

Last month, we announced a new benefit for members of the UPM: discounts on entertainment activities through an organization called the Recreation Connection. At that time, we understood that faculty members interested in taking advantage of the discounts would only have to submit orders at the organizations Web page, but we were wrong. Several people on the faculty tried submitting orders but found that they had to fax or mail an order form to an address that we had not listed.

So here is what we hope is the complete procedure for ordering discounted tickets and the like:

To order by mail or by fax, you must first secure an order form. You can get an order form from the UPM Office on the Kentfield campus, you can request a form by calling (818) 386-1046, or you can print out the form from the organizations Web page, found at this address:

www.recreationconnection.com

Once you have the form, you can mail it to:

Recreation Connection P.O. Box 260854 Encino, CA 91426

Or you can fax the form to:

(818) 386-9702

The Recreation Connection offices are in southern California where they have established walk-up order counters, but so far, no such facility exists in our area.

For information, call (818) 386-1046.

Gift Certificates

Sees Candies $8.30/lb

Movie Tickets

Pacific $4.75

United Artists $4.75

Entertainment 98

Marin/Norh Bay $25.00

Monterey Bay

The Aquarium $12.25

Pier 39

Value Pass for discounts at

Underwater World, Blue &

Gold Fleet, Pier 39 Garage

San Diego Zoo

Deluxe pkg. $16.75

Web Page graphics & design by Mike Godsey, windfind@metro.net

 Forms

Forms